tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-81144299083449735442024-03-20T21:00:05.430-07:00That Fiend in Hell: A comprehensive studyJeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-17132726566615200352013-10-21T19:16:00.001-07:002013-11-01T08:34:16.854-07:00That Fiend in Hell: Soapy Smith's Denver reign in the Haigh dissertation. <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTbzbvi1tWH0aSkkW-5zh7DH7ieIKA6KHf5dzgD7ZGmG0-06-9-5EKiJgT2SMp3R-SYo_AT6urxU6ORnuwAU5EHeqWbOmolPaTO8JayyPbyKNsuFgx6PqTs6kRBY0Qacmv_ub6UVJLmkQx/s1600/Photo_14_RMN_1-_16_1892.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="301" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTbzbvi1tWH0aSkkW-5zh7DH7ieIKA6KHf5dzgD7ZGmG0-06-9-5EKiJgT2SMp3R-SYo_AT6urxU6ORnuwAU5EHeqWbOmolPaTO8JayyPbyKNsuFgx6PqTs6kRBY0Qacmv_ub6UVJLmkQx/s400/Photo_14_RMN_1-_16_1892.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span id="yui_3_7_2_1_1383280194447_2174"><span id="yui_3_7_2_1_1383280194447_2173" style="font-family: Lucida Grande;">Soapy Smith in front-page cartoon<br />(3rd from left at
the table)</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>Rocky Mountain News</i>, October 16, 1892</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
(Click image to enlarge)</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In 2009 Jane G. Haigh completed her dissertation for a PhD in history and American Indian studies at the University of Arizona. The title of her work is <i>Political Power, Patronage, and Protection Rackets: Con Men and Political Corruption in Denver 1889-1894</i>. <br />
<br />
On page 8 of <i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, Cathy Spude incorrectly states that Jane Haigh<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
dispels the notion that Smith was influential in Denver politics, concluding that he was used by the Denver politicians as a tool to buy votes. </blockquote>
<br />
Spude goes on to expand Haigh's supposed "conclusion" by stating that Soapy's "infamy" came from "the pleasure Denver newspapermen took in making fun of him—and by extension the candidates that he supported—than any real influence he had in Denver politics." Spude gives Haigh a general footnote credit, which cites no page(s), and adds how "This conclusion" should be taken into account in evaluating "Smith's overall legend."</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I own a copy of Haigh's dissertation, have read it thoroughly and looked back through it numerous times. I found it well written and informative, but I also found that Haigh presents a very different history than the one of which Spude writes. Nowhere in the dissertation does Haigh indicate that Soapy was merely a tool, that Denver newspapermen took Soapy's reign lightly, or that they made fun of him. On the contrary, Haigh does write that "The most well known con man in Denver was Jefferson Randolph 'Soapy' Smith..." (p. 38). To demonstrate Soapy's prominence and degree of influence, Haigh quotes numerous newspaper accounts, such as this one published on July 29, 1889, in Denver's <i>Rocky Mountain News</i>: </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Soapy, in the language of the fly-by-night fraternity “has”
Denver…. He has it to do with what he will in so far as all professional
swindling and stealing is concerned…. The city is absolutely under the control
of this prince of knaves, and there is not a confidence man, a sneak thief, or
any other parasite upon the public who does not pursue his avocation under
license from the man who has become great through the power vested in him by
those whose sworn duty it is to administer the laws without fear or favor.<i> </i>(Dissertation, p. 77; also see more of this article in <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, pp. 145-46. The article includes this subtitle in capitals: "HE OWNS THE TOWN.") <i><br /></i></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Haigh adds the following:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Arkins
[editor and owner of the <i>Rocky Mountain News</i>] was correct that in addition to his personal soap game and gambling, Soapy
Smith had gained control of a downtown protection racket that exercised
authority over the operations of thieves and con men, and paid off the police
on behalf of all. Soapy developed this practice in Denver, perfected it in
Creede, Colorado at the height of the brief silver rush, and later applied it
to his advantage at Skagway, Alaska at the beginning of the Klondike Gold
Rush. (Dissertation, p. 77)</blockquote>
<br />
An examination of the dissertation shows that the "conclusion" Cathy Spude claims Jane Haigh draws does not belong to Haigh but to Spude and Spude alone.</div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" /></a></div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-6377124422089768962013-10-17T16:53:00.001-07:002013-10-31T21:36:56.953-07:00That Fiend in Hell: The deputy U.S. marshals of early Skagway.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhH7vk8EgcKzneNe213jvMR9tEh0tBc-83fNy6cPN9BOlA4aWeAsduYkegX5ormPOzfQKs3zMJHUxxrjxiqbwA6B_RD37NQd9rw3uzJq50aWvsv77qocGkQm_k56G1WYM9WDEshH2Mwiwia/s1600/Deputy_US_Marshall_Badge1_med.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhH7vk8EgcKzneNe213jvMR9tEh0tBc-83fNy6cPN9BOlA4aWeAsduYkegX5ormPOzfQKs3zMJHUxxrjxiqbwA6B_RD37NQd9rw3uzJq50aWvsv77qocGkQm_k56G1WYM9WDEshH2Mwiwia/s1600/Deputy_US_Marshall_Badge1_med.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On page 21 of her book, Cathy Spude states that U.S. Marshal John Shoup in Sitka appointed only one deputy to Dyea and Skagway, D. H. McInness, during the winter of 1897-98. The author then reasons that since McInness was stationed in Dyea and the only route to Skagway at the time was
across four miles of often turbulent water, McInness probably asked for
assistance from the vigilante organization in Skagway. Apparently the author forgot about the other deputy U.S. marshal assigned to Dyea and Skagway, James Mark Rowan. He was at first in Dyea with McInness but later established an office in Skagway and a home where he lived with his pregnant wife. He remained there until fatally shot in an ambush on January 31, 1898. Marshal Shoup in Sitka then appointed another deputy U.S. marshal to serve in Skagway, Sylvester S. Taylor. He remained stationed in Skagway until Shoup relieved him of duty in July 1898. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdclRxG18hDBpWmHbMfJpIf4THGTAvX1fK3fhtYUUZj6FDwWJ8RefD5G1svPLHee8NCpmslHiVeeIUOauQeZppwI9R7aFig54IyLwUwLO9gsVgp1sEhx3Dx2wPLMjULvhOMwmZnBN6m2kM/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdclRxG18hDBpWmHbMfJpIf4THGTAvX1fK3fhtYUUZj6FDwWJ8RefD5G1svPLHee8NCpmslHiVeeIUOauQeZppwI9R7aFig54IyLwUwLO9gsVgp1sEhx3Dx2wPLMjULvhOMwmZnBN6m2kM/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-10454474829745854132013-05-24T17:57:00.002-07:002013-05-25T19:04:45.559-07:00That Fiend in Hell: On good and not-so-good comments. <table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfTFvSitvWuhIUBRs63diuj3oCqWDejkynVYVZQvDMMwB9qOIV1Fk66r9X4YsS1PmolZlQts0AtkEFWQ5NTHERqYndTUh1eRugpwHlarhAPJ28gHIi7i9JWZ9PCOPMyiwC6gv7AV9dV-Pt/s1600/index.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfTFvSitvWuhIUBRs63diuj3oCqWDejkynVYVZQvDMMwB9qOIV1Fk66r9X4YsS1PmolZlQts0AtkEFWQ5NTHERqYndTUh1eRugpwHlarhAPJ28gHIi7i9JWZ9PCOPMyiwC6gv7AV9dV-Pt/s1600/index.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">M. J. Kirchhoff's new book</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A difference is apparent between the book review comments made by those who have not researched Soapy Smith and those who have. <br />
<br />
Cathy Spude's website contains seven comments about <a href="http://www.montanadawn.com/Soapy__Legend.html" target="_blank"><i>That Fiend in Hell</i></a> by various writers, researchers, and publishers. Of these, only William H. Hunt is known to have published anything about Soapy Smith in Alaska (Chapter 5, "Vigilantes," <i>Distant Justice: Policing the Alaskan Frontier</i>, 1987). Unfortunately, Hunt's 16-page chapter contains the common, erroneous information put forth by previous authors who were willing to pass along hearsay and fiction about Soapy Smith. My aim in addressing this matter is not to belittle those who have written so glowingly of Cathy Spude's book but to point out that these writers have not been serious researchers about the life of Soapy Smith and his immediate environment. For this reason, their glowing comments about <i>That Fiend in Hell</i> tend more toward friendly flattery than authoritative comment.<br />
<br />
The exception is William H. Hunt. He points to himself as one who made errors in representation and who learned from Cathy Spude's book. Subsequently he also read my biography and wrote that he appreciated my research and its presentation (see <a href="http://aliassoapysmith.blogspot.com/p/what-others-say.html" target="_blank">comment, top right column</a>).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A contrast to the statements addressed above about <i>That Fiend in Hell</i> comes from M. J. Kirchoff, twice named Alaska Historian of the Year and author of the new book <i>Dyea, Alaska</i>. It appears in <a href="http://www.skagwaystories.org/2013/05/great-new-book-on-dyea.html" target="_blank">Skagway Stories</a>, a blog devoted to the history and people of Skagway, Alaska. Provided below is this blog post in full, with Mr. Kirchoff's "comment" emphasized.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Yesterday I attended a lecture at the National Park Service by M. J. Kirchhoff on violence on the trails and the Soapy story. <b>There was also a critical review of Spude’s book which many agreed had many false assumptions and mistakes. Mark agreed that Jeff Smith’s book on Soapy is a very good reference for students and historians. </b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Mark’s new book is called Dyea, Alaska: The Rise and Fall of a Klondike Gold Rush Town, printed in 2012 and available at the Skagway News Depot in Skagway. I leafed through it and was amazed at the incredible collection of historic photos of Dyea that have never been published before. Also at their clarity and good descriptions. Here is Michael Gates description: 'Kirchhoff is a widely respected historian whose previous works include an excellent biography of Jack Dalton as well as <i>Clondyke: The First Year of the Rush</i>… Kirchhoff tackles the overlooked aspects of Alaska and Yukon history and fills in the gaps in our understanding of the North…. Kirchhoff’s book charts the rapid decline of Dyea, and offers an explanation for the eventual death of this once bustling community, but you will have to read the book to learn the answer....</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
All writers and researchers appreciate friendly comments about their work and tend to publish them in promotions. Sometimes, though, the comments seem not so friendly, and the best of these are the ones that point out the good and the not so good, such as mistakes or perceived failings. When only the comments of those less than fully qualified are presented, all highly flattering, the effect tends more toward puffery than honest comment. In the pursuit of truth, good can come from comments that also find fault. They help to adjust a work and make better work possible.<br />
<br />
I guess it all boils down to this: when a work is published, its life is not over. It keeps on living the life that has been given it by its creator. Glowing comments from those not so qualified to evaluate do not establish or preserve the quality of a work. Only its ability to present truths that last over time can do that.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitBjpR2VUFf1RSVeKq2T2dPKhCTppnn-J_adN7cR34Hvu0ico_6zjg1l1cezaO9ucDm3Ed2_7wstu2o_J98kzUWCKtB93Ycq258daBH8JoFAlvIgeRYtmTZnINNGyUkKgU4Skk6YJLyfLs/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitBjpR2VUFf1RSVeKq2T2dPKhCTppnn-J_adN7cR34Hvu0ico_6zjg1l1cezaO9ucDm3Ed2_7wstu2o_J98kzUWCKtB93Ycq258daBH8JoFAlvIgeRYtmTZnINNGyUkKgU4Skk6YJLyfLs/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-53255241329976460812013-04-16T11:54:00.000-07:002013-04-16T11:54:05.284-07:00That Fiend in Hell: Not misunderstanding<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxwGyg0aj546ztmQWx2zMCILicQ5aA8aFFLF3iyEmrPvalcHvKmZG7LrAjzWT99ITpXggiCVatCG4lHhbZSc5oTQYux1s2DeD2zTmfmpJXCPzX4IYNoKFlbZavq_QFLa7OYnnzt4FUfmug/s1600/Happy_10_A1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="331" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxwGyg0aj546ztmQWx2zMCILicQ5aA8aFFLF3iyEmrPvalcHvKmZG7LrAjzWT99ITpXggiCVatCG4lHhbZSc5oTQYux1s2DeD2zTmfmpJXCPzX4IYNoKFlbZavq_QFLa7OYnnzt4FUfmug/s400/Happy_10_A1.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I am happy to mark completion of the tenth post devoted to examining the book <i>"That Fiend in Hell": Soapy Smith in Legend.</i> I have taken time and care with these posts as each has required close and careful examination of the author's reasoning and conclusions.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Not Misunderstanding <i>"That Fiend in Hell"</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On her blog Cathy Spude writes,</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The purpose of the book is to use the story of the last months of Smith's life, as it evolved after his death, to illustrate my understanding of how history, legend and myth intersect in modern American society. It is simply an exercise in the dissection of popular history.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
… I was not interested in the details of history but the framework of the legend....</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
… My book is not about history. It is about myth and legend in modern American society….</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Ever since my first comment regarding <i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, the author has insisted that I do not understand the purpose of her book. I do understand her statement of purpose. I also see many problems in her book that undercut that purpose. As I mark post #10 on this blog, I wonder if she can now understand why I have undertaken this blog. The reason for each posting is self-explanatory, and the accumulation of their type points to the general cause: the book contains a large accumulation of errors in fact and of interpretation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
To repeat, I absolutely understand her words as they are written above. Her book is not about history but about myth and legend, and yet she seems to want to revise history to justify her understanding of myth and legend. Looking into the exaggerated and fictional stories weaved into Soapy's life history is indeed interesting and even a little fun. However, I did not start and now continue this blog to examine those falsehoods and exaggerations. No, I began this blog because (1) I also found that many of the historical facts had been misinterpreted or interpreted so strangely as to merit examination, and on a personal note, because (2) there are discourteous accusations about my research and book that I seek to dispel.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Cathy Spude has also written that she believes I interpret <i>"That Fiend in Hell"</i> as a “personal affront” to my ancestor. Rather, in general, I interpret her work as an affront to history. While in various ways and in various sections of her book, she undeniably presents new information and apt interpretation, her book also contains many instances of error and strangely insistent and narrow interpretation. As a result, I have many more detailed points to publish before this blog is complete.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I hope you are enjoying the posts as much as I do in bringing them to you. While their cause is not so enjoyable, I find that the opportunity for close examination of topics is. My objective in conducting each of these examinations remains the same, to serve the goal of the Soapy Smith Preservation Trust: To preserve, promote, and expand a factual history of Jefferson Randolph "Soapy" Smith II. The purpose of Cathy Spude's book is often obscured by numerous factual and interpretive errors. These I do not misunderstand in the least and will continue to address them in the months and years ahead.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5_5nM3cngoYk37u9TmXlL9lIYCf_xjCqj5N14rpHrl3Q8YRw519qFJSZjriWNzjyu3WOiFgUY34teCrkee7T3th3pZfFx6V3uAzX0pwrySfr1lbxcJKpyFNVzEV8UAAAeSyA37TWOx9RH/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5_5nM3cngoYk37u9TmXlL9lIYCf_xjCqj5N14rpHrl3Q8YRw519qFJSZjriWNzjyu3WOiFgUY34teCrkee7T3th3pZfFx6V3uAzX0pwrySfr1lbxcJKpyFNVzEV8UAAAeSyA37TWOx9RH/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-43725566392758899592013-04-12T15:55:00.001-07:002013-04-12T16:55:40.623-07:00That Fiend in Hell: "Jeff Smith fails to mention," except that he did "mention"..., and a lot more about the murderer of Soapy Smith.<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgH-jlgy-C8HwbNUCxjZJSTjWqA38DWSjFnMZABwK5JVx280wZ0kuXjM2dVTwLb7jFMLj_ezx_oq1NIBf5NRJTuVlw_0uKNAZNo_SzT5ZZMCN19aA-B84OzNaEQRlBiIVtwaY9hWg-z1Xsz/s1600/SoapySmithcopy_unframed.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgH-jlgy-C8HwbNUCxjZJSTjWqA38DWSjFnMZABwK5JVx280wZ0kuXjM2dVTwLb7jFMLj_ezx_oq1NIBf5NRJTuVlw_0uKNAZNo_SzT5ZZMCN19aA-B84OzNaEQRlBiIVtwaY9hWg-z1Xsz/s640/SoapySmithcopy_unframed.jpg" width="450" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">THE END OF SOAPY SMITH</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The Shootout on Juneau Wharf</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Smith and Reid shoot one another as Jesse Murphy (left)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">rushes in to aid Reid.<span style="font-size: small;"> Murphy kills Smith<span style="font-size: small;"> with Smith's rifle.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">A</span>rtist Andy Thomas worked closely with Jeff Smith to get the details precise<span style="font-size: small;">.</span></span><br />
(Courtesy of Andy Thomas)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
On pages 192-93 of <i>"That Fiend in Hell,"</i> author Cathy Spude offers an example of how I make an "effort to convince … readers that Jesse Murphy 'murdered Soapy'…." She points to a news report that I cite in the July 19, 1898, issue of the <i>Portland Morning Oregonian</i> and asserts that I cite only the portion of the sentence that serves my point (that Murphy claimed to have killed Soapy Smith) and that I purposely left out the rest because it disputes my point. To make her case about the omission from the Portland paper, she uses phrases like "Jeff Smith fails to mention" and "he fails to point out."<br />
<br />
This is indeed a very strange quibble because I did quote the entire sentence. In fact, I quote not just the entire sentence but the entire paragraph in which the sentence appears. The matter is made even stranger because to document her accusation, she cites the numbers of three surrounding pages on which discussion of the matter appears, but she fails to list the page on which appears the entire sentence and paragraph from the <i>Portland Morning Oregonian</i>. Here for clarity is that paragraph as it appears on page 548 of <i>Alias Soapy Smith.</i><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The shooting, Dr. Cornelius says, is the best thing that ever happened to Skagway next to the new railroad. Dr. Cornelius performed the autopsy on Smith’s body for the coroner’s jury. A man named Murphy claimed after the first autopsy that it was his bullet that killed the gambler, and it was necessary to perform a second [autopsy] to determine that Reed’s [sic] bullet did the work.</blockquote>
<br />
I would like to think that the author of <i>"That Fiend in Hell"</i> just made a mistake. Mistakes happen. I even made one once … perhaps two. But Cathy Spude takes such a heavy handed approach that it seems there is much more than a mistake at work in her thinking. In writing that "Jeff Smith fails to mention" and "fails to point out," she does not imply but rather outright accuses me of intentionally leaving out text in order to "justify" a conclusion. I cannot know what was in Cathy Spude's mind, but the stern, accusatory tone of her language does make itself known and felt as she apparently intended. Then in light of how her example is in complete error, revealed is not just a mistake or careless inattention to detail but a deep and determined bias against my biography of Soapy Smith. I am at a loss for any other way to explain such a focused indictment based on an error of her own making.<br />
<br />
Cathy Spude in her criticism of my treatment of Soapy's death and the cover up that followed would have a reader believe my conclusion is based on half a sentence rather than the 23 pages of evidence and interpretation that appear in chapters 25 and 26 of <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> (pages 538-561). I took much time and care in laying out the evidence, evaluating it, and drawing reasoned conclusions about it. To my knowledge, nothing has been omitted or obscured.<br />
<br />
The story of the murder of Soapy Smith has just appeared in a feature-length article I was invited to write for <i>Wild West </i>magazine (April 2013, pages 44-51). It's a nice spread, with many illustrations. Though a feature piece, its space requirements called for compression, so only the most pertinent facts and the overall conclusion appear. For the full story, my book is the ultimate source for a survey of all known evidence and an even-handed examination of it.<br />
<br />
Cathy Spude on page 193 of her book also claims that Jeff Smith lacks "understanding of [the] historic context" of Skagway in 1898. Probably no one will be surprised to learn that Jeff Smith disagrees. For three decades I have studied the players of this period and the details of their doings. I know this context extremely well; I just don't follow Cathy Spude's interpretations of people or events. Each of these disagreements, as well as correction of errors—one at a time—will make good reading for other days.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE9D67SPzhgMbQenBQolobSGj0APieLFWFmBq2VIeGA3M-eikzK1A-XyZOHuH4halqMAr2qqZla94K_3dibeRV5QX1USmiJ2BYpIBxQ_f2t9k90lyvzlVezBnG_wpqLSJR-TZOXnK9QpTf/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE9D67SPzhgMbQenBQolobSGj0APieLFWFmBq2VIeGA3M-eikzK1A-XyZOHuH4halqMAr2qqZla94K_3dibeRV5QX1USmiJ2BYpIBxQ_f2t9k90lyvzlVezBnG_wpqLSJR-TZOXnK9QpTf/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span id="goog_82129738"></span><span id="goog_82129739"></span><br /></div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-23682872153286171062013-04-08T22:21:00.000-07:002013-04-09T18:36:59.711-07:00That Fiend In Hell: Research for Alias Soapy Smith was unscholarly and lazy?<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2t8xlXJ6oFsmx-GGYCiKFoq8aKIUy-Y8EbmqnG1NrZGG79MIoKlxetZxUP-7RIlL7ZQ2XfmJxwjjtogOsfZ-Q57YN-4ZI2wohkaA3VEOMT2DE_APXRgFAOZIpTnR9sgga037Ty0XZ-dQ2/s1600/adoption-research-studies.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="182" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2t8xlXJ6oFsmx-GGYCiKFoq8aKIUy-Y8EbmqnG1NrZGG79MIoKlxetZxUP-7RIlL7ZQ2XfmJxwjjtogOsfZ-Q57YN-4ZI2wohkaA3VEOMT2DE_APXRgFAOZIpTnR9sgga037Ty0XZ-dQ2/s320/adoption-research-studies.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justified;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Throughout <i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, author Cathy Spude assails my research as unscholarly and at times implies that I was lazy in its conduct. Emphasized is the assumption that the bulk of my research was performed online, but as explained in the preface of my book, that was far from the case. Newspaper research was especially difficult in 1985 when I began the task as there were no online collections that allowed one simply to open a screen and type in a key search word. My early research took me to numerous libraries, archives, and museums in Alaska, Colorado, and Washington to view microfilm unavailable through inter-library loan. On page 192 of her book, Spude assumes and implies that I accessed Alaska newspapers online, but as she researched the same Alaska newspapers I did, she is fully aware that, even now, these newspapers are not available online. Further, she assumes I accessed other sources for quotation from these newspapers. This is not the case. Every quotation in my book that is from Alaska newspapers in Skagway for 1897-98 comes from photocopies in my possession from library-held microfilm of those newspapers, cranked through a "reader" page by page.
</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In my home state I ordered microfilm rolls, one at a time, for two decades. As microfilm has no search capability or index, thousands of hours were invested in scouring each of the many reels, reading page-by-page, day-by-day, year-by-year, researching my subject and those in his circle in newspapers of that time and place. I was extremely successful in finding and publishing information that otherwise might never have been uncovered and explored because much of it lay buried until I found it, assembled it, gave it interpretive context, and published it in 2009. "Reading upwards of 90,000 pages took years. It was a daunting task but proved a goldmine of information not known to have been republished anywhere...." (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> p. 6).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPTd4FP4UkGc7YEqIFDUNK90CZUEqdH1FtB9Fm7fvqlzzEagjCx39y86g891TkA8efn6Uzbfd5_l3_PxtiWxyZbKNtKXP1Pb-JIYBUDVjw4R13AEtA5jjqf1s_NeXAm_Ve3t-LUF_D_i1n/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPTd4FP4UkGc7YEqIFDUNK90CZUEqdH1FtB9Fm7fvqlzzEagjCx39y86g891TkA8efn6Uzbfd5_l3_PxtiWxyZbKNtKXP1Pb-JIYBUDVjw4R13AEtA5jjqf1s_NeXAm_Ve3t-LUF_D_i1n/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-80237898787601567232013-03-01T12:16:00.000-08:002013-03-01T14:59:05.126-08:00That Fiend in Hell: Unscholarly and biased?<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpf4In6qdlshdoF44ZGbf6ze4hMR4X4TcJaMMBCqJssSlleiZ47qfNkYUpWjkIkhmfZ3OnZuesx8jSgJ74uQxMtIi5uHZkihKfnzWhRtIZ4VUesw2b9QXPPURLUh4Y43EjlfH9dB91yucV/s1600/keyorg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpf4In6qdlshdoF44ZGbf6ze4hMR4X4TcJaMMBCqJssSlleiZ47qfNkYUpWjkIkhmfZ3OnZuesx8jSgJ74uQxMtIi5uHZkihKfnzWhRtIZ4VUesw2b9QXPPURLUh4Y43EjlfH9dB91yucV/s640/keyorg.jpg" width="426" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Demand Evidence - Think Critically</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">I made this inspiring poster long ago for myself</span><br />
<br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Throughout <i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, author Cathy Spude assails my research as unscholarly and biased. On page 191 the author writes, </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
As is evident from Jeff Smith’s biography, these stories no doubt emphasized Soapy’s good works and were soft on the more cruel or iniquitous aspects of the gambler’s behavior. </blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is such comments that make me continue to question if she has even read my book. The fact is, as of 2009 <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> <u>includes all known</u> “… cruel or iniquitous aspects of the gambler’s behavior.” </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I began writing <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> over 25-years ago with the full intent of not publishing a biased or white-washed biography. In handing over my manuscript to my publisher at Klondike Research, I required that he check for any evidence of bias or white wash. He did so, and in turn, he tasked his staff with the same chore along with their regular duties. A few questionable instances were found, brought to my attention, and revised by me to achieve a balanced presentation based on evidence available to me at the time. The following comes from the book preface. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is important to me for the reader to understand that although I am related to the subject of this book, I do not pretend to believe Soapy was “a good guy” or someone to be admired. I would be untruthful were I to say it is not fun being a descendant of an Old West bad man. The little moments of celebrity are enjoyed. But my primary interest has been the history of Soapy Smith. I am not proud of what he did but rather of what he left behind, an outsized history of a complex character at the center of often rough frontier times. No attempt has been made to mask his crimes. As my father used to tell me, “Jeff, he’s more interesting that way,” how he really was—his charities, crimes, all. (—<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 5)</div>
</blockquote>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_NYCDdzw3i_aWej-QKjwuksJ26e8JhxL0PWtsTTDh4LTm25AlaqluUWIAXMr-ULvbeiBhi8f_aOYu1SJd0p2d8vsylg-TeUgEtuTI8MSHl7hycKOIONv8g6b6B_ceLGex9HixPYdMi28i/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_NYCDdzw3i_aWej-QKjwuksJ26e8JhxL0PWtsTTDh4LTm25AlaqluUWIAXMr-ULvbeiBhi8f_aOYu1SJd0p2d8vsylg-TeUgEtuTI8MSHl7hycKOIONv8g6b6B_ceLGex9HixPYdMi28i/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
</div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-82141827938937826702013-02-18T15:03:00.000-08:002013-02-22T12:09:33.164-08:00That Fiend in Hell: Clancys as partners of Soapy Smith.<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4mO66cztB09XQ7ktPSKgvw3cUzx005vdF8HuT_S_3eyNiQ_OY7FxnaqT1s62tpjhqmOJJwakQbaTvN473hsdh2ud0VeI9Rg9qNhttF118svaAsTv5trtNaJJt2BzNXLNzmVVHpQRLi-24/s1600/Item_32_Business_Card_a.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="395" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4mO66cztB09XQ7ktPSKgvw3cUzx005vdF8HuT_S_3eyNiQ_OY7FxnaqT1s62tpjhqmOJJwakQbaTvN473hsdh2ud0VeI9Rg9qNhttF118svaAsTv5trtNaJJt2BzNXLNzmVVHpQRLi-24/s400/Item_32_Business_Card_a.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">(Click image to enlarge)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
A business card (see above) found among Soapy Smith's belongings after his death reads, “Clancy & Company, Music Hall and Club Rooms, First-Class Restaurant in Connection.” The eatery opened sometime in January 1898. (<i>Skaguay News</i> 12/31/1897, p. 12. Clancy advertisement reads in part, “Will have after January 1st a first-class Short Order Cafe in connection. Open Night and Day.”
Clancy and Company business card, circa 1898, artifact #32, author’s col. <a href="http://soapysmiths.blogspot.com/2011/04/1898-john-and-frank-clancy-skagway.html" target="_blank">See more here</a>.)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On pages 38 and 39 of <i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, author Cathy Spude states that I published in <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> how Soapy partnered up with Skagway saloon proprietor Frank Clancy as a silent partner “during November and December of 1897....” This is not true, although a formed partnership before November is possible and after December is definite. The author states that I offer “no proof, not even notes or letters with hints as to the connections.” This statement is also untrue as well as misleading as she never explains the source of Clancy and Smith's partnership after November and December 1897, instead leaving her readers to believe that Smith and the Clancys had never formed a partnership at all. Allow me to explain in full.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEie3aCPv1UZWx6kY75ANpFrN-SrRqyZWSCFistONSifLcLto8C20U6A3BCHj3ZZNQxcFSrAjYDzkjpA_TeSvHcK1UOW2yaSn1CCnDIoCY0JNCe2CMDw88mnuruqxjOmjvjWngfbgi1XLl_p/s1600/Clancy_saloon.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="231" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEie3aCPv1UZWx6kY75ANpFrN-SrRqyZWSCFistONSifLcLto8C20U6A3BCHj3ZZNQxcFSrAjYDzkjpA_TeSvHcK1UOW2yaSn1CCnDIoCY0JNCe2CMDw88mnuruqxjOmjvjWngfbgi1XLl_p/s400/Clancy_saloon.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Clancy's Saloon 1897</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">It was here that Soapy first partnered with Frank and John Clancy</span><br />
<br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<br />
In my post published 1/8/2013 ("<a href="http://thatfiendinhell.blogspot.com/2013/01/that-fiend-in-hell-soapy-smith-thrown.html" target="_blank"><i>That Fiend in Hell</i>: Soapy Smith thrown out of Skagway?</a>"), I discussed how Soapy first arrived in Skagway on August 22, 1897, and left again 23 days later on September 14, 1897. He returned after a four-month absence. This absence of course means that Soapy was not in Skagway in November and December. Although during this period a precise chronology of his whereabouts among the lower 45 states is not known, Soapy is placed by several sources in New York City during latter November and early December (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 448). With travel back to Skagway assumed to require at least two weeks, it seems sure he had not returned until January 1898. A business agreement in August/September 1897 between Soapy and the Clancys is possible, and even probable, but no hard evidence has yet revealed such an association. The reasons for this likelihood are many, and all of them are taken up throughout my comprehensive biography of Soapy Smith. Here are a few of these reasons.<br />
<br />
Jeff arrived in Skagway just a little less than a month after the rush to the port began, going to work among the stampeders immediately. Soapy would have met the Clancys at their saloon, both as a patron and as one looking for an association. Their saloon at first might have been a tent somewhere in town, perhaps on the site of their permanent location at what is now 7th and State Avenues. To meet and work out behind-the-scenes arrangements with proprietors of saloons, music halls, and gambling houses was part of Soapy's long-practiced business model, notably in Denver and Creede, Colorado.
Jeff had learned from experience that he needed to keep a low profile in his formal business dealings and would have insisted that his name be kept off the signage and the formal records of any business in which he participated. More of that in a moment. <br />
<br />
Next is the matter of Soapy's roulette table.<br />
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCM0t4RYKdMJ5K8JNyXr9GAf0oGQb3UqX3EyUSkQmEyoOo-MgUN0cNGt5iXTymidhB4Gth6kvOKuDFvFiLUgNNd7XFvN0bBxzxXakJ_R6mr09LxWICfi5OFsGY5zZnc0cfd1_YOUJ5AtcM/s1600/roulette.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCM0t4RYKdMJ5K8JNyXr9GAf0oGQb3UqX3EyUSkQmEyoOo-MgUN0cNGt5iXTymidhB4Gth6kvOKuDFvFiLUgNNd7XFvN0bBxzxXakJ_R6mr09LxWICfi5OFsGY5zZnc0cfd1_YOUJ5AtcM/s1600/roulette.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Soapy Smith's roulette table</span><br />
Purchased from the Pullen Collection<br />
by John Randolph Smith<br />
<br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
After Soapy's death, it was obtained by Harriet Pullen for her Skagway hotel museum. She indicated in writing that Soapy Smith purchased the wheel and table for $1000 from George Mason and Company of Denver, Colorado (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 451). When the Pullen collection was auctioned in 1973, the Smith family purchased the table and wheel.<br />
<br />
This roulette setup was never in Jeff Smith's Parlor. A standard George Mason roulette wheel runs 31 inches, and with table, the width would be about 36 inches, or 3 feet. The Parlor at that time was about 18 feet wide by 40 feet long. It had a large bar running the distance of the left wall in the main room, and no more than 4 men (photographs show) could stand side by side from the bar to the other wall. None of the three photographs of the Parlor interior show a three-foot wide roulette table or any other kind of gambling equipment.<br />
<br />
So if Soapy's roulette wheel did not go into the parlor, where did it go? Given the Clancy/Soapy Smith partnership in the Parlor; that Soapy most likely helped Frank win a seat on the city council (<i>Skaguay News</i> 06/17/1898) along with two-thirds of the others on the council who were closely associated with him (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 563); that John Clancy was later named executor of Soapy's estate; and that John Clancy was photographed with Soapy in the Parlor twice—given all these points of close connection, together they add up to this: that wheel spun in none other than the Clancy & Company, Music Hall and Club Rooms. Additionally, Soapy had no known partnership, public or private, with any business owners in Skagway except for the Clancys. The Clancys did not have any such partnerships either except for the public, recorded partnership with Soapy Smith. These matters point to there having been an early, strong association between the Clancys and Soapy. And so does this: The Clancy "brothers … syndicate included saloons, gambling houses, and dance halls all along the West Coast and Alaska" (<i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, p. 38). This status made the Clancys people Soapy would want to associate with. From his Denver days on, Soapy worked closely with only the biggest gamblers and houses. Naturally he would aim to partner up with operators of the same stature in Skagway. It would not be in just some saloon that he would invest his new, thousand-dollar roulette wheel and table. It would be in one of size and class, and the only candidate for that in the late winter or early spring of 1898 in Skagway was the new Clancy Music Hall.
<br />
<br />
<br />
Frank Clancy is listed as the general manager of Clancy & Company (<i>Skaguay News</i> 02/11/1898, p. 1.), and Soapy is certain to be the “& Company” because he needed to be a silent partner to shield the business from his reputation. I'll take up this matter next. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhauKKsZJUcX2nkZXJJ3ozQ_2E1WqLiAN6qMedZZafgDc6d8HNYUI56dh6XVujZ-Q4rrH4ZEqVaUrozTxTFaYr3wyaCNjC_CL_26SXTWEn54cmmO60-oB9vwcBoWJyYcH-IqSQMIsqZykqj/s1600/34+Soapy+In+Parlor+4.tif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="281" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhauKKsZJUcX2nkZXJJ3ozQ_2E1WqLiAN6qMedZZafgDc6d8HNYUI56dh6XVujZ-Q4rrH4ZEqVaUrozTxTFaYr3wyaCNjC_CL_26SXTWEn54cmmO60-oB9vwcBoWJyYcH-IqSQMIsqZykqj/s400/34+Soapy+In+Parlor+4.tif" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Inside Jeff Smith's Parlor</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Soapy poses in front of the bar</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">John Clancy tends bar</span><br />
(Denver Public Library)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
On page 39 of <i>That Fiend in Hell</i> the author states that the first known business arrangement between Soapy and Frank Clancy was the saloon called Jeff Smith’s Parlor in May 1898. This is the first publicly known business arrangement. This agreement could safely be made a public one as Jeff Smith’s Parlor was the first business operated by the two men that did not openly involve the business of gambling. Here's why that was important. During previous years in Denver (about 1889 to 1893) Soapy learned that his criminal reputation hurt his gambling establishments. Not many serious gamblers were willing to hazard their money in a casino whose owner had a national reputation as a successful confidence man. A document (artifact #111, <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 197) in my collection dated 10/01/1891 shows that Soapy had publicly "sold" his Tivoli Club business to another party. To the general public he no longer owned the club; however, other sources clearly show that he continued to control and operate the Tivoli Club until approximately 1895 when he left Denver. The sale was a ruse to take Soapy’s name and criminal reputation off the business. As the years progressed, Soapy continued to open and operate numerous saloons and gaming houses, but he ceased putting his name before the public or on public documents as owner or part owner of such establishments. He instead had associates use their names as proprietor. By the time he arrived in Skagway in 1897, the name Soapy Smith was synonymous with crime and well-known across the country. Running a gambling operation under his own name was no longer a good business move; thus, he began his relationship with the Clancy brothers as a silent partner.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In my collection is a letter dated June 13, 1898, from Seattle, written by Jim Wilson, a gambler at the Pack Train saloon in Skagway, or possibly “Diamond Jim” Wilson, the highly successful Dawson businessman, gambler, and later proprietor of the Anvil Saloon in Nome. It is a letter of referral addressed to “Frank Clancy or Jeff Smith,” to introduce a gang prospect, a common practice within the brotherhood of bunco men. The letter reads,</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjj72tuw4TukwFet0ZLAx3T947nAFAhfPvIEiUSyhnN8TZAPn2glHbbtYzTfv-mjuhggZVUz7RBaa4OT_FTmy5vQxXSVMjWF2YfxF3htKuiXRWNm8qKt9ePKSWnKYdnwVNMwxABrNTDplBH/s1600/Item_8.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjj72tuw4TukwFet0ZLAx3T947nAFAhfPvIEiUSyhnN8TZAPn2glHbbtYzTfv-mjuhggZVUz7RBaa4OT_FTmy5vQxXSVMjWF2YfxF3htKuiXRWNm8qKt9ePKSWnKYdnwVNMwxABrNTDplBH/s400/Item_8.jpg" width="302" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"> (Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Frank Clancy or Jeff Smith<br />
Dear Friends<br />
This will introduce to you Morris Behan a brother of Hugh Behan He is all right and any thing you can do for Him will be appreciated by your friend as ever. Jim Wilson <br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
(artifact #8, author’s col. <a href="http://soapysmiths.blogspot.com/2010/04/artifact-8-letter-of-introduction.html" target="_blank">See more here</a>.)</div>
</blockquote>
<br />
This note, which appears on page 552 of <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>,<b> </b>was likely written by Jim Wilson in Seattle and handed to Morris Behan who traveled to Skagway and handed it to Soapy as the letter was with his belongings after his death. Not known is if Morris succeeded in landing a position on Frank Clancy's and/or Soapy's payroll. What this artifact tends to show is that among those in the underworld brotherhood of confidence men and professional gamblers, Frank Clancy was known to be an underworld associate of Soapy Smith. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiokM6ygvTEagQVA-otMKLWU7l_V-BaMAp6IU4kexeUyN2LfUExqPpWPWPsLDSnhQRAheAbo9aubgU0E3Wlcty_WpVBYN3yVLPUqXaUTmYuVwKKdj0awnjvzUrfVPZlrRjW6xouVNWKXflz/s1600/Photo_33_Soapy_In_Parlor_0001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="281" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiokM6ygvTEagQVA-otMKLWU7l_V-BaMAp6IU4kexeUyN2LfUExqPpWPWPsLDSnhQRAheAbo9aubgU0E3Wlcty_WpVBYN3yVLPUqXaUTmYuVwKKdj0awnjvzUrfVPZlrRjW6xouVNWKXflz/s400/Photo_33_Soapy_In_Parlor_0001.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Inside Jeff Smith's Parlor</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Soapy poses in front of the bar</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Partner John Clancy stand just to Soapy's right</span><br />
(Alaska State Library)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS7RcFerb8SN5F62dICSx_8sRx0iWSNhQ-MVoSZfkXFvNE0R0HJkLY3gxKGKzsJJVm2sbr_dUtfgqpoytYI4hrd2YfL1tpNdM1c8rGTF2VMnd2d27gYrSyoq_g78lP-CRAc5pQGFdYh1ix/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS7RcFerb8SN5F62dICSx_8sRx0iWSNhQ-MVoSZfkXFvNE0R0HJkLY3gxKGKzsJJVm2sbr_dUtfgqpoytYI4hrd2YfL1tpNdM1c8rGTF2VMnd2d27gYrSyoq_g78lP-CRAc5pQGFdYh1ix/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
</div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-40502432485386521452013-01-08T19:39:00.000-08:002013-01-09T08:54:38.104-08:00That Fiend in Hell: Soapy Smith thrown out of Skagway?<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu-8wOrOa2zXi2vw-x3favOr0K2zbHQHZgdsQqRT1Re0lRs-MZO7VgRGuxo9PSoxwOfieHkMJGQffwrZkOYvcTVCAX8dVCsbDo5yVyJqNIceizW6F3rsQtaQxKob9hGgyXcwTdDoM9adTc/s1600/Broadway_and_Bond_Aug_11_1897_Standing_is_P_A_Petersen.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="255" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu-8wOrOa2zXi2vw-x3favOr0K2zbHQHZgdsQqRT1Re0lRs-MZO7VgRGuxo9PSoxwOfieHkMJGQffwrZkOYvcTVCAX8dVCsbDo5yVyJqNIceizW6F3rsQtaQxKob9hGgyXcwTdDoM9adTc/s400/Broadway_and_Bond_Aug_11_1897_Standing_is_P_A_Petersen.JPG" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Broadway and Bond (Fourth)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Skaguay, Alaska</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">August 11, 1897</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">The way the camp looked when Soapy Smith arrived.</span><br />
Courtesy of eBay<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span><br />
<br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On page 22 and again on page 30 of <i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, the author Cathy Spude causally mentions that in September 1897 a Denver newspaper states how the people of Skagway, Alaska, ran Soapy Smith out of town. She adds that Soapy traveled to St. Louis, Washington, D.C., and New York City, but skips over his first stop in Seattle, Washington, during which time his great success in Skagway was disclosed.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Soapy Smith was not forced to leave Skagway. Rather, he left for personal reasons all his own. The whole story is interesting, and I’d like to share it with you.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Let's begin by backing up from September 1897 to mid August, when from Seattle, Soapy Smith and two other confidence men, Jack Jolly and Jerry Daily, traveled by steamship to Skagway. They arrived in the 27-day-old camp on Sunday, August 22, 1897. The three men worked their swindles for 19 of 23 days and in that time made $30,000 and divided it before returning to Seattle (–<i>Alias Soapy Smith, </i>p.<i> </i>435, <i>Denver Evening Post </i>11/15/1897). </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Jeff hated the Alaska winter and would have preferred to spend it down in the states (–<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 442). With business so good, though, he would endure the wind, rain, snow, and cold. Something else, however, made Soapy leave Skagway while his operations were so successful: his wife Mary. Receiving word that she was ill, Soapy boarded the <i>SS Queen</i> for Seattle on September 14, 1897, and docked there eight days later (<i>–Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 435). The <i>Seattle Daily Times</i> interviewed passengers returning from Alaska, and Soapy was one of them. In his interview he claimed to have earned $18,000 to $20,000 during his short stay in Skagway, amounts equivalent today to over $600,000 (–<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p.442, <i>Seattle Daily Times</i> 9/23/1897). </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Also aboard the <i>Queen</i> with Soapy (who was accompanied by Daily and Jolly) were US Attorney Bennett and US Marshal James McCain Shoup. They claimed that Skagway residents forced Soapy out of Alaska (–<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 442, <i>Denver Evening Post</i> 9/23/1897), but this was not true. In Seattle "Bat" Masterson spoke with Jerry Daily and later reported to the <i>Denver Evening Post </i>what he (Masterson) learned about Soapy’s time in Skagway and departure from there. <i></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I saw very few people from Denver. I heard of but did not see Soapy Smith. The report that he was driven out of Skaguay was erroneous. I met his partner Jerry Daily, at Spokane. He said they were in Skaguay twenty-three days and ‘worked’ nineteen days while there. During the nineteen days they captured $30,000, which was divided into four parts, over $7,000 each, but Soapy got the most of it ultimately. He received a telegram that his wife was sick in St. Louis and went to that city to be with her. They did not have time to bother with him at Skaguay, for everybody was too busy looking out for themselves. (–<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, p. 443, <i>Denver Evening Post</i> 11/15/1897) </div>
</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Four months later, on January 21, 1898, the <i>Skaguay News</i> reported Soapy’s return. If Soapy had been run out of town, he would have encountered resistance to his return and settling in to stay. But no such difficulty is in evidence. Seven days later M. H. Craig reported to the <i>Denver Evening Post </i>that Soapy was working the shell game along the trails (–<i>Denver Evening Post</i> 1/28/1898). Soapy’s supposed deportation from Skagway was never reported in Skagway and never brought up again.</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5_5nM3cngoYk37u9TmXlL9lIYCf_xjCqj5N14rpHrl3Q8YRw519qFJSZjriWNzjyu3WOiFgUY34teCrkee7T3th3pZfFx6V3uAzX0pwrySfr1lbxcJKpyFNVzEV8UAAAeSyA37TWOx9RH/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5_5nM3cngoYk37u9TmXlL9lIYCf_xjCqj5N14rpHrl3Q8YRw519qFJSZjriWNzjyu3WOiFgUY34teCrkee7T3th3pZfFx6V3uAzX0pwrySfr1lbxcJKpyFNVzEV8UAAAeSyA37TWOx9RH/s1600/Blog_divider_309.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-33200692311135619512012-12-05T20:11:00.000-08:002013-01-08T19:41:31.374-08:00That Fiend in Hell: Alias Soapy Smith not good enough?<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZfDNwCgERV_xDfFxy66q4oHyc00SfJT8u3clRmnt7lyT2KDFae5zdlSRruYguWg_aNW0bpd6os0wHxKwurVWXfq7lD2o2_9qmWFehokmGn9Tb6p5sFSeeOSiAqkapArvsNw3noj6fOHLk/s1600/719535115recent93.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZfDNwCgERV_xDfFxy66q4oHyc00SfJT8u3clRmnt7lyT2KDFae5zdlSRruYguWg_aNW0bpd6os0wHxKwurVWXfq7lD2o2_9qmWFehokmGn9Tb6p5sFSeeOSiAqkapArvsNw3noj6fOHLk/s640/719535115recent93.jpg" width="432" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
On page 8 of <i>That Fiend In Hell</i>, the author states that “only three professional historians have attempted to examine the Smith story within some context other than that of an adventure.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
These three works are as follows:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Bearss, Edwin C. <i>Proposed Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park Historic Resource Study</i>. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, 1970. Pages 181-97, 16 pages relate to Soapy Smith. Cathy Spude says that Bearss relies on Pierre Berton’s work, which she feels is not reliable.</li>
<br />
<li>Hunt, William R. <i>Distant Justice: Policing the Alaskan Frontier.</i> Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1987. The section on Soapy, pages 52-67, is only 15 pages, and Cathy Spude states that Hunt's treatment lacks focus on Smith because it is narrowed to vigilantism in 1898 Skagway.</li>
<br />
<li>Haigh, Jane G. "Political Power, Patronage, and Protection Rackets: Con Men and Political Corruption in Denver, 1889-1894." Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, 2009. With little discussion and no documentation, Cathy Spude claims this work shows that Soapy Smith had little influence on Denver politics.</li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In her Introduction, these are the only scholarly treatments of Soapy Smith that Cathy Spude found worthy of mention. Apparently she forgot the 628-page biography titled <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, which she reviewed two years before and about which in part she wrote, "the book is well-cited, with numerous footnotes and a detailed index" (<i>Alaska History</i> Vol. 25, No. 2, Fall 2010, p. 57). Shouldn't this comprehensive, carefully researched, fully documented, critical treatment of "the Smith Story" receive a mention with those others? It would seem so especially since the author finds fault with two of them for not questioning and for lacking focus on the Smith story. What seems to be the case is that Cathy Spude intentionally omitted mention of the comprehensive, critical biography because its author is not classified by Cathy Spude as a "professional historian," as if only one with such a title bestowed by her is capable of producing factual works.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In writing about the history of the Old West, author and historian Paul Cool observes that “… the grassroots historian probably has been responsible for much, if not most of the discoveries of the past 35 or more years concerning the details of the lives, acts of violence, and deaths of such men (and occasional women), and of the many men and women who were witness to or wrapped up in their stories” (<a href="http://www.paulcoolbooks.com/?p=231">http://www.paulcoolbooks.com/?p=231</a>, 6 Jun 2012, accessed 5 Dec 2012).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Surely the "professionals" are not the only ones to have developed sufficient historical background, skill, and discipline to find evidence, categorize it, measure it, question it, and present it in a published form that may be considered "scholarly" and be reasonably termed "history."<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-50324780958220649772012-11-21T22:55:00.001-08:002013-10-17T16:58:29.777-07:00That Fiend in Hell: Soapy Smith as grand marshal of the July 4, 1898 parade.<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmQiZR8u05G7qy21efOTw_RzEO8KhQfwFWFS-hxGnw10jpJt5MvzK7HgT7S5rVe-ypArOkNGCDI_I4NAqomsqtFMUH65E64os6P1Zk-ykRbM8cz0svPrD-UDiDPdrAcpytbYAnutun1yhD/s1600/Zz_95358.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="308" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmQiZR8u05G7qy21efOTw_RzEO8KhQfwFWFS-hxGnw10jpJt5MvzK7HgT7S5rVe-ypArOkNGCDI_I4NAqomsqtFMUH65E64os6P1Zk-ykRbM8cz0svPrD-UDiDPdrAcpytbYAnutun1yhD/s400/Zz_95358.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Soapy on his horse awaiting the parade to commence.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Holly Street, July 4, 1898</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Corner of Jeff Smith's Parlor is seen on the far left.</span><br />
<br />
Royal British Columbia Archives Col., James A. Sinclair col. (ZZ-95358)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In <i>"That Fiend in Hell,"</i> the author addresses how participation of Soapy Smith in the 4th of July parade of 1898 has "become so mythologized that it is almost impossible to cull the fantasy from the fact" (p. 53). However, despite many claims to the contrary, the author states as "fact" that Soapy did not lead the July 4 parade (p. 55).</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
<i>“That Fiend In Hell,”</i> pages 53-55</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIXqG_aO2zmXSkiSR8YwCe0c98n7XVypccgQQ-t98tLTXvSi8G3GQPks1rgW_Q-zVJ86E_kDQq27tFqIh4pCwvrHYGAdJYJcEvhW8yNEw0NXAgKUzVZ-ovBMOy2UsqBrZHp-BtBKGSQVIu/s1600/Divider+for+Fiend+Blog.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIXqG_aO2zmXSkiSR8YwCe0c98n7XVypccgQQ-t98tLTXvSi8G3GQPks1rgW_Q-zVJ86E_kDQq27tFqIh4pCwvrHYGAdJYJcEvhW8yNEw0NXAgKUzVZ-ovBMOy2UsqBrZHp-BtBKGSQVIu/s1600/Divider+for+Fiend+Blog.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, the only known newspaper accounts about the parade that took place in Skagway, Alaska, on July 4, 1898, are the ones published previous to that date. No newspaper accounts about the parade <u>on</u> or <u>after</u> that date are known to exist. However, there are numerous published eyewitness accounts from people who claimed to have seen the parade. Not a single eyewitness account is known to exist that states Soapy was positioned at the rear of the parade. All of them remember seeing Soapy at the head of the parade.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Newspapers prior to July 4, 1898, list Soapy as the marshal of the fourth and last division of the parade, assisted by Skagway pack train owner J. H. Brooks and Soap Gang member William Tener. The fourth division had four parts: the Skaguay Military Company, the Fitzhugh Lee float, the Man of War float, and J. H. Brooks's Pack Train. "Fitzhugh Lee'' was the American bald eagle captured alive outside of Skagway by two men. They brought it to the city and gave it to Soapy in honor of his patriotic efforts in creating the all-volunteer Skaguay Military Company and offering its services to President McKinley during the Spanish-American War. The author of <i>"That Fiend in Hell"</i> writes that the bird was named after a Southern Confederate general (p. 55). Fitzhugh Lee was a general during the Civil War, but Soapy was honoring Lee, the American Consul General based in Havana, Cuba (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> p. 520), when the battleship <i>Maine</i> was sunk in February 1898, starting the war.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEik4feGflpeoZIkTnr9eys4aYoWlRW0baih8FkwRlZvxLdvaOx8S7iAHyIW5SHkgG9VBcsKkIeOU0uU858Tz79Xsl2vf6FILyJ_8rok-bz4IPd7rSREh6GVyduQ3ympetvOw0EkxV7qiiGc/s1600/zz_95360.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="297" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEik4feGflpeoZIkTnr9eys4aYoWlRW0baih8FkwRlZvxLdvaOx8S7iAHyIW5SHkgG9VBcsKkIeOU0uU858Tz79Xsl2vf6FILyJ_8rok-bz4IPd7rSREh6GVyduQ3ympetvOw0EkxV7qiiGc/s400/zz_95360.JPG" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Fitzhugh Lee" float awaiting parade to start.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Holly Street, July 4, 1898</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">The live bald eagle is in the cage.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">John Clancy's son dressed as Uncle Sam by the cage.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Jeff Smith's Parlor on the right of photograph.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Flag <span style="font-size: small;">bearer</span> for the Skaguay Military Company stands behind the wagon.</span><br />
Royal British Columbia Archives Col., James A. Sinclair col. (ZZ-95360)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<br />
What follows is how the coming July 4th parade is presented in my book. I share it here to set the stage for how Soapy Smith might have led the parade, at least for a time.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
With the approach of the July Fourth holiday, Skaguay was full of excitement. The Commercial Club, consisting of business owners, took early control of planning the celebration and appointed a committee to arrange “for the proper observance and celebration of the Glorious Fourth.” Skaguay would have a parade, of course, and the committee decided it would consist of three divisions and three marshals, with Commercial Club President C. W. Everest as grand marshal. Jeff’s name does not appear as a planner or as being in the parade, but by July 1 his name appears in the plans as marshal of an added forth division. The <i>News</i> published the program.</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
[1] Grand Marshal, C.W. Everest and aids J.F. Burkhard and A.P. Tony [2] Band [3] Marshal First Division—S.L. Lovell and aids [4] Veterans [5] Children’s Float with Goddess of Liberty [6] News boys [7] Chilkat Indians [8] Grotesque characters [9] Bicyclists [10] Marshal Second Division—C.N. Hanson and aids J.G. Price and Sam Roberts [11] Knights of Pythias [12] Ladies Cavalcade [13] City Brewing Float [14] Gentleman’s Cavalcade [15] Skaguay Brewing Float [16] Floats and displays of Skaguay business and industries [17] Marshal Third Division—F.W. Whiting and aids Messrs. Heney and Wilson [18] Railroad employees [19] Mechanic’s Floats [20] Marshal Fourth Division—Jeff R. Smith and aids Wm. Tener and J.H. Brooks [21] Skaguay Guards and “Fitizhugh Lee” [22] Man of War Float [23] Brooks Pack Train.</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The parade will form on Broadway at 1:30 p.m., and after parading the prin- [unreadable line] … front of the city hall where speeches will be delivered by the orators of the day, Messrs. R. W. Jennings, Walter Church, Judge Sehlbrede and Dr. Campbell.</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The following sentence is from Sinclair's July 4 diary entry: "Went to wharf to hear programme and was called upon to open with prayer on about 2 minutes' notice" (Royal B.C. Museum, MS 1061; 98002-10, reel 1). Indicated is that the location for the speeches was changed from the place announced in the paper (in front of city hall) to one of the wharfs.<br />
<br />
Those who have read the history of Soapy will surely recognize that being listed as marshal of the fourth division and dead last in the parade no doubt sat ill with him. He was well-known as a very patriotic man who always flew American flags from the majority of his businesses in Colorado. Surely, he reasoned, given his success with the May 1 parade, no one knew better how to lead a celebration and stir a crowd than he. The committee had planned the parade, but Soapy planned to make it memorable.</div>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7w-Y3VZ_lV1mDb2fpptYNXokf3xbHKjBQG_7MDzStu32LfUESzrn4lxHhgYvcWrnWx-KxLLb37LM2otB4S5rdDQloF4tjeSJ_h0iSscq0k_uA6urNorIkO4ftD_manx9LI2JDQo3Jiy6b/s1600/Untitled-4%5B1%5D.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="275" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7w-Y3VZ_lV1mDb2fpptYNXokf3xbHKjBQG_7MDzStu32LfUESzrn4lxHhgYvcWrnWx-KxLLb37LM2otB4S5rdDQloF4tjeSJ_h0iSscq0k_uA6urNorIkO4ftD_manx9LI2JDQo3Jiy6b/s400/Untitled-4%5B1%5D.JPG" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Soapy on horseback, left side of Broadway street.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Brooks <span style="font-size: small;">Pack <span style="font-size: small;">T</span>rain</span> center</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">No sign of floats, Skaguay Military Company, etc.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Klondike Gold Rush National Historic Park (KLGO-00532)</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is one known photograph taken of Soapy (see above) during the parade, and it offers some clues. The author of <i>“That Fiend In Hell”</i> points to this photograph as proof that Soapy did not lead the parade (p. 67), but there is more in that photograph, made conspicuous by their absences, that better offers us clues as to what could have happened that day.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Captain Jefferson Smith was proud of the Skaguay Military Company he commanded and no doubt would want to lead it on his dapple-gray horse. Since formed on March 19, 1898, Soapy had had his military unit drilling, and by June, a newspaper reported that the company continued to drill "every night" (<i>Sitka Alaskan Report</i> 06/01/1898). Newspapers were notified of the following parade sequence in Soapy's division: Soapy, the well-drilled Military Company, the “Fitzhugh Lee” float, consisting of a large wood and wire cage on a wagon decorated with six American flags and traditional tri-colored bunting. John Clancy’s six-year-old son, Frank, dressed as Uncle Sam, riding on the wagon behind the driver. Then the Man of War float, followed by the Brooks Pack Train. However, a considered look at the parade photograph shows something missing—in fact, that quite a bit is missing. The Brooks Pack Train has a sign, but the division marshal is without one. Missing also are the “Fitzhugh Lee” float and the Man of War float, nor is Captain Smith at the lead of his prized Skaguay Military Company. Soapy's history reveals a man who rarely gave up or gave in unless forced to, and even then, not without resistance. The parade committee chosen by Skagway merchants hardly seems a threat to Soapy, so it is likely he had a plan to circumvent its will. A plan so effective and generally pleasing that it remains a part of the annual July 4 parade tradition in Skagway to this day. What was Soapy's strategy? I will explain.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Reverend Sinclair wrote in his diary for July 4 that “Soapy mounted was much in evidence” (Royal B.C. Museum, MS 1061; 98002-10, reel 1). Why would he write that if Soapy just rode alongside Brooks and Tener for the entire parade? The answer is that he wouldn't. The words "much in evidence" imply that Soapy made himself evident in the sense of being noticeable and conspicuous, and showing up in different places. Prominent Skagway citizen Harriet Pullen wrote that Soapy Smith asked her to participate in the parade and that she did. "It was during the parade," she continued,</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
that I had my second interview with "Soapy" [—]when galloping up and down the line on his white charger, he stopped and thanked me for taking part, then wheeled and headed for another part of the parade. (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> p. 522)</blockquote>
</div>
<br />
Here is what I think could have happened during the parade that day.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Going in one direction, the parade moved down Broadway toward the harbor with Soapy’s contingent at the very rear. Soapy knew that he could not talk the parade committee into changing its line up and getting what he wanted. So instead, he made a parade plan of his own. His fourth division would remain at the end of the parade, but as it was reaching the end of its course, Soapy put his plan into action. He dashed about, up and down the parade, announcing that they should turn about and make another pass back through town. Everyone had worked hard on the floats and costumes and on getting organized, so in the spirit of the 4th of July, the idea of more parading would not have been rejected out of hand. Having announced the proposed about face all along the parade, Soapy turned his horse and galloped back to the end of the parade where the Skaguay Military Company, Fitzhugh Lee, and the Man of War Float were already turned around and waiting for him. Then, with Soapy suddenly at the head of the parade, he led it back up the street before anyone could do anything, but follow. Perhaps some did not follow, such as those at the very front, the grand marshal and the dignitaries, who might have left their mounts and carriages and walked to the program stage as planned. But even if they didn't follow the parade back, nevertheless, Soapy would have led a sizable contingent of his own, presumably with many following.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjlAss56HUeHszVYKBUXe7neCzxc-oB10uliUqt-yO53DOrpuOex7dSOPMwEBkQXiPNllVTYRuHFco_M7MmG5L1MRXEO-8GVmMvi70kk2WbZEMOsbNrsUE7rq9iBPxtFIsvK-Ia0EpxUBHF/s1600/100_1419.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="311" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjlAss56HUeHszVYKBUXe7neCzxc-oB10uliUqt-yO53DOrpuOex7dSOPMwEBkQXiPNllVTYRuHFco_M7MmG5L1MRXEO-8GVmMvi70kk2WbZEMOsbNrsUE7rq9iBPxtFIsvK-Ia0EpxUBHF/s400/100_1419.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Fitzhugh Lee" float during parade.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Broadway, Skagway, Alaska July 4, 1898</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">John Clancy's son holding onto a board attached to the <span style="font-size: small;">eagle's</span> cage.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Flag <span style="font-size: small;">bearer</span> for the Skaguay Military Company stands behind the wagon.</span><br />
<br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<br />
This is when Soapy and his company shined as they performed the grand military maneuvers they had been practicing. Always the planner when it came to managing a crowd, Soapy would have had his many friends, supporters, and particularly his "associates" spread among the spectators, boosting enthusiasm and excitement as Soapy would bring his mount to a stop and the military company would perform some sharp maneuver. Then lifting his hat and waving to the crowds to acknowledge their approval, he would lead on, guiding his mount from side to side to present himself. Of course, it is not known what Soapy actually did during the parade. This is just a possible scenario. However it was, Soapy at the head of his Skaguay Military Company must have put on a spectacular show for him to be remembered as the grand marshal of the parade.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">__________</span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The author of <i>“That Fiend In Hell”</i> writes that Governor Brady wrote a letter to his superior, the secretary of interior, about July 4 in Skagway … “noting that the town had far too many bunco artists.” In actuality, Brady's report also mentions Soapy, stating that “Everything is orderly now, but there is a character there now by the sobriquet ‘Soapy Smith’ and he seems to have the gambling element completely under his control.” Brady also expressed the fear that Jeff “might find it convenient to have the [railroad] men strike just after a payday and rush them into the town to help his business” (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> p. 523).</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
With Governor Brady in Skagway that July 4 was his seven-year-old son, Hugh. He later wrote that his father tried to strike a deal with Soapy. If Soapy would give up Skaguay, the governor would make him a deputy marshal at Sitka. Jeff is said to have respectfully declined (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> p. 524).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
The <i>Skaguay News</i> reported how the Fourth “was a great day for amateur photographers, as every man, horse, mule and float was ‘snapped’ at on every corner….” These picture-takers probably photographed the decorated speakers’ platform as well. Rev. Sinclair is reported to have taken up a good picture-taking position, but photographs of this venue have yet to surface in the present day. Hopefully one day they may (<i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> pp. 522-23).
</blockquote>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiT_HrP5Sxa5D2u1vMHwTLgMJ5RHcus963g8MrCT70AkblQ8x9Vpj8JCIOszb1gzs96AvJsyGdESWy44LZYtfQR5ZZAbT_NBSuOuBqRXX18v8gCdct55h2PmkEzT4u52GBhAEqp4CnRMjPV/s1600/2720.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="287" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiT_HrP5Sxa5D2u1vMHwTLgMJ5RHcus963g8MrCT70AkblQ8x9Vpj8JCIOszb1gzs96AvJsyGdESWy44LZYtfQR5ZZAbT_NBSuOuBqRXX18v8gCdct55h2PmkEzT4u52GBhAEqp4CnRMjPV/s400/2720.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Children’s’ Float with Goddess of Liberty</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Broadway, Skagway, Alaska July 4, 1898</span><br />
<br />
University of Alaska (Fairbanks) Archives (UAF-1976-35-60).</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">__________</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4OsEgw7HPmOQlN5ZONYAYj-OeIW5PWV7oNocsD_rAfCU116nInFmSduT77DtQbnY9rHbeSod4rYs-5BBTXvBEUgeYUUpLn9NB1XBHyYbt6Auyn-vEzTDG6So1DZcEEHLLEwniR91l1Uxg/s1600/7_4_98_Bill_Saportus.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="387" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4OsEgw7HPmOQlN5ZONYAYj-OeIW5PWV7oNocsD_rAfCU116nInFmSduT77DtQbnY9rHbeSod4rYs-5BBTXvBEUgeYUUpLn9NB1XBHyYbt6Auyn-vEzTDG6So1DZcEEHLLEwniR91l1Uxg/s400/7_4_98_Bill_Saportus.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: large;">Fourth of July parade.</span></i><br />
<i><span style="font-size: large;">"Bill" Saportas one of the "sure-thing" men.</span></i><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Could this photo have been taken on the "turn-around" pass of the parade?</span><br />
<br />
BRSGY036</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">__________</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrQN9LuPqeuWBMqSoKmDAblkoz78yGpyv9hBlJwwHzzoiK-ZnYbyDipKRp3wPECpiPsOQUFAU2P9BZJHhb7BmL_rgAHDvGcGhVbP02GqqTy6clOlgDl-xKLgPu8cHCcLBMF9siA8596Npc/s1600/MA16_5177-1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="268" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrQN9LuPqeuWBMqSoKmDAblkoz78yGpyv9hBlJwwHzzoiK-ZnYbyDipKRp3wPECpiPsOQUFAU2P9BZJHhb7BmL_rgAHDvGcGhVbP02GqqTy6clOlgDl-xKLgPu8cHCcLBMF9siA8596Npc/s400/MA16_5177-1.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">A portion of the fourth of July . Start of parade.</span><br />
<br />
BRSGY076</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-23844097240034072792012-11-16T14:59:00.001-08:002013-10-17T16:57:22.811-07:00Addendum Post<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjW4dMGpALakfBMMe2O_Vz8HA-bjMf4GqT7pTMnKS3g2SMmeZsamx8acHICOdUBjgT7Xsp-ErmCaWBlFqp-GxJ2HaJMhHog-6Qtu2HbkRYZyIRoKkuM1VCyytENgF1eXumRqXxeQgDD85dc/s1600/37A+Jeff%27s+Parlor+May+1,+1898.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjW4dMGpALakfBMMe2O_Vz8HA-bjMf4GqT7pTMnKS3g2SMmeZsamx8acHICOdUBjgT7Xsp-ErmCaWBlFqp-GxJ2HaJMhHog-6Qtu2HbkRYZyIRoKkuM1VCyytENgF1eXumRqXxeQgDD85dc/s400/37A+Jeff%27s+Parlor+May+1,+1898.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">May 1 or May 30, 1898?</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Cathy Spude, author of <i>"That Fiend In Hell,"</i> has created a <a href="http://montanadawn.com/-That_Fiend__Discussion.html" target="_blank">page</a> on her website to counter the information I am posting on this blog. On her page she notes that I have this photograph in my book, <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i>, misidentifying the man mounted on horseback as being Soapy Smith, and that Soapy is in the crowd, just to the right of the horse.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I have a high dpi copy of this photograph and can safely rule out that the man in the crowd is Soapy Smith. She gives the opinion that Soapy "is not in the parade at all. He is merely a face in the crowd of on-lookers." Of course Soapy, as the captain of the Skaguay Military Company (plainly seen carrying signs identifying themselves), would naturally lead his company in any and all the parades in Skagway, Alaska.<br />
<br />
Cathy is correct that my book misidentifies the man on horseback as being Soapy. However, this mistake was caught, addressed, and fully explored on my Soapy Smith's soap box blog over 2-1/2 years ago (see complete story <a href="http://soapysmiths.blogspot.com/2010/04/historical-mistakes-can-definitely-be.html" target="_blank">here</a>). In short, the man is sitting on Soapy's horse, and it was first assumed that the man must be Soapy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
The implication that the above photograph was not taken on May 1, 1898, but rather May 30, 1898, is an ongoing debate. Skagway is known to have had two parades in 1898. Could there have been three? I will explore this possibility in a future posting.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-2773023826142590872012-11-01T16:19:00.000-07:002013-10-17T16:55:39.177-07:00That Fiend in Hell: Ranks of the Skaguay Military Company<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQnpy0WGl0fSlXDdf4XMfT4tgjanPTPoI6GTygIW5wCmqQzuNSYPWALTib0dqfTZYRB-sdhGZz5MjTefendN1TWcHXJcR4PgBy01Mxaocpxi6mBEZfbVrPVRa-beFqvgU_U7WBxaTRAgLN/s1600/37A+Jeff%27s+Parlor+May+1,+1898.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQnpy0WGl0fSlXDdf4XMfT4tgjanPTPoI6GTygIW5wCmqQzuNSYPWALTib0dqfTZYRB-sdhGZz5MjTefendN1TWcHXJcR4PgBy01Mxaocpxi6mBEZfbVrPVRa-beFqvgU_U7WBxaTRAgLN/s400/37A+Jeff%27s+Parlor+May+1,+1898.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">May 1, 1898 Skagway, Alaska parade</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Parade participants pose for a photograph</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">(Center) Jeff Smith's Parlor can be seen decorated with flags and bunting</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">(Far left) <span style="font-size: small;">Volunteers</span> hold signs reading "The Skaguay Military Company."</span><br />
(Alaska State Library, William R. Norton col., ASL-P226-117)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
At that time it [the legend] states that he organized a grand patriotic parade featuring a number of Skaguay Militia members, which he had mobilized from among the ranks of the sporting element to go off and fight for the United States against the Spanish in Cuba.</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
—<i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, p. 48</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2LS-zK0ymPzHFoFtFwggTiDXWXgM_q6spu735m_N1UqfgivfN6vpIqG4K8YgMsFXB-uelVrtuQZM9uLPl7JbXgV-ujR-jhidWdc5v6Rb3US47fXExRHbrZcO5uGaZ9DjsgRRTU8EWAe29/s1600/Divider+for+Fiend+Blog.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2LS-zK0ymPzHFoFtFwggTiDXWXgM_q6spu735m_N1UqfgivfN6vpIqG4K8YgMsFXB-uelVrtuQZM9uLPl7JbXgV-ujR-jhidWdc5v6Rb3US47fXExRHbrZcO5uGaZ9DjsgRRTU8EWAe29/s1600/Divider+for+Fiend+Blog.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfIWLyLObsRRPnk4NvEsdo8C3x8X4WffvWDW7TgFvIJQLTiCE-KMTQxf-kqILqrJQhNzdKMRL1eONqohsZdMmTo0JxPm01BO-CefIo0Hrsdche3lmGb6wNo_oZnRibl8CUzVFcGohlPzYL/s1600/Item+_34_Document_5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfIWLyLObsRRPnk4NvEsdo8C3x8X4WffvWDW7TgFvIJQLTiCE-KMTQxf-kqILqrJQhNzdKMRL1eONqohsZdMmTo0JxPm01BO-CefIo0Hrsdche3lmGb6wNo_oZnRibl8CUzVFcGohlPzYL/s400/Item+_34_Document_5.jpg" width="205" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Volunteer enrollment list</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Skaguay Military Company</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Entire 5 page document</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">can be viewed on the </span><br />
<a href="http://soapysmiths.blogspot.com/2011/05/artifact-34-formation-of-soapy-smiths.html" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size: small;">Soapy Smith's soap box blog</span></b></a><br />
(Jeff Smith collection, artifact #34)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span></div>
<br />
<br />
A transcript of the originating documents for the Skaguay Military Company (item 34, Jeff Smith collection) is published in <i>Alias Soapy Smith</i> (pp. 487-89). Dated March 19, 1898, the documents include the names of the original eighty-five members.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Names on the roster belonging to known members of the Soap Gang include John Bowers, John Miller, and Ed Burns. Probably most of the officers were fully acquainted with Soapy, but a majority of the men appear to be ordinary citizens and stampeders. I have examined the extensive Skagway names file collected by Skagway Historical Society member Marlene McCluskey. It numbers above eight thousand, but most of the names of Skaguay Military Company members (beyond the three names above) do not appear in this file. Those few who do appear are identified by such as "Theatre Royal owner, Klondiker, Packer." The author of <i>That Fiend in Hell</i> states that members of the Skaguay Military Company were "mobilized from the sporting element," by which one supposes is meant "gamblers" or "sure thing" men whom Soapy knew. This statement is not documented or made clear. Apparently it is an assumption. I undertake in my book to explain why Soapy would have seen major recruitment from his "associates" as a bad idea. <br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Membership in the Skaguay Military Company continued to grow after the minutes and roster of volunteers had been typed up. These signed documents enclosed by cover letters were sent to District of Alaska Governor John G. Brady and President William McKinley. Names of the several new recruits were added, hand written in ink.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpUGDbfBOpcrWQsx0Yh6S8d50jPaf3KQmkY-BNJMhrJRnCaIH4K2K6NLSBfgj-lW7Tw5Ov3AqZTRFNXpwjJDmgQnYD6OCY20IjiPNFVRM2dprtc-TPPzVYJ5_kbbvdnetdtLBhlQs12ByI/s1600/Men_standing_front_of_parlor.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpUGDbfBOpcrWQsx0Yh6S8d50jPaf3KQmkY-BNJMhrJRnCaIH4K2K6NLSBfgj-lW7Tw5Ov3AqZTRFNXpwjJDmgQnYD6OCY20IjiPNFVRM2dprtc-TPPzVYJ5_kbbvdnetdtLBhlQs12ByI/s320/Men_standing_front_of_parlor.jpg" width="298" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Men lined up outside Smith's Parlor waiting to join.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">These men do not appear to be of the “sporting element.”</span>
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">B<span style="font-size: small;">ancroft library, Univ. of California, Berkeley</span> </span></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">(Click image to enlarge)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114429908344973544.post-77041135020063977142012-10-19T11:09:00.000-07:002013-10-17T16:56:08.711-07:00That Fiend in Hell: Soapy Smith's beard<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>The beard ... in 1898 ... was seriously old-fashioned. Dandies had not worn full beards since Rutherford B. Hayes left the White House in 1881; by the turn of the twentieth century, the clean-shaven look was all the rage. ...[V]ery few allowed a full beard to grow. It only raised the question of a city man's suspicious character that he would grow a beard in 1898. </i></div>
</blockquote>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
–<i>That Fiend in Hell</i>, p. 31</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhn2Y5GC0aM3jN8LTlhdCMf4lR6Zvdi_DiNsL2UYBT28Zb6fWpq10UPVG1FV7ilwH3d7_qXoS2gbk8zXDSL82h6HL-A56JKuDzFUabfzP4LtcNwCs3tnze17X-Aa3KsGNbEKVI9nHgl5iNd/s1600/Divider+for+Fiend+Blog.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhn2Y5GC0aM3jN8LTlhdCMf4lR6Zvdi_DiNsL2UYBT28Zb6fWpq10UPVG1FV7ilwH3d7_qXoS2gbk8zXDSL82h6HL-A56JKuDzFUabfzP4LtcNwCs3tnze17X-Aa3KsGNbEKVI9nHgl5iNd/s1600/Divider+for+Fiend+Blog.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The author is correct that beards were <u>on their way</u> out of style, but they were hardly missing from society, nor were they objects of questionable suspicion. For some years previous to growing a beard, Soapy Smith sported a mustache. It is believed he grew his beard in 1890 and kept it until his death in 1898.</div>
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizNGVnSWxSk4RQjJqfYpLVCDGF89vNI4Bb8HXlvBjX8_pbxpcj2-74v_H341RXsc9DuB0Zyeb9lPIf_nNJFsO09yHzA1m_qz3Ty9kv7NcXvpNItkjATk_MkHqg755bBTU322DSSCNaYUZy/s1600/Rmn_3_20_1890_p2_drawing.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizNGVnSWxSk4RQjJqfYpLVCDGF89vNI4Bb8HXlvBjX8_pbxpcj2-74v_H341RXsc9DuB0Zyeb9lPIf_nNJFsO09yHzA1m_qz3Ty9kv7NcXvpNItkjATk_MkHqg755bBTU322DSSCNaYUZy/s1600/Rmn_3_20_1890_p2_drawing.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">A beardless Soapy Smith</span><br />
<i><span style="font-size: small;">Rocky Mountain News</span></i><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">March 20, 1890</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
With his beard, Soapy was in good company historically. After President Lincoln in the 1860s, every president except Andrew Johnson (1865-1869) and William McKinley (1897-1901) had either a beard or a heavy moustache, and after McKinley, two more presidents had facial hair.</div>
<br />
<ul>
<li>Rutherford B. Hayes had a full beard, 1877-1881.</li>
<li>James A. Garfield had a full beard, 1881.</li>
<li>Chester A. Arthur had a huge mustache and sideburns, 1881-1885.</li>
<li>Grover Cleveland had a large mustache, 1885-1889.</li>
<li>Benjamin Harrison had a full beard, 1889-1893.</li>
<li>Grover Cleveland had a large mustache, 1893-1897.</li>
<li>William McKinley had no facial hair, 1897-1901.</li>
<li>Theodore Roosevelt had a prominent mustache, 1901-1909.</li>
<li>William Howard Taft had a huge mustache, 1909-1913.</li>
</ul>
<br />
An online search produced numerous sources documenting how the "clean-shaven look" was not "all the rage" and how facial hair was a prominent fashion choice. The following are two examples. <br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>HAIRSTYLES AND FACIAL HAIR
<br />
<i>Male hair was cut fairly short during the 1890s, however facial hair was fashionable. Moustaches were common and beards ranged from bushy, to pointed, to rounded, to goatees. In spite of this, the clean-shaven look was also gaining popularity for younger men during this decade. </i></i>(<a href="http://17thstreet.net/more/costume/male.php." target="_blank">1890s Costume</a>, "Here you are able to find detail on 1890s fashion." Nunn, Joan. <i>Fashion in Costume 1200~2000</i>. 2nd ed. Chicago: New Amsterdam Books, 2000.) </div>
</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>After 1860, and until the end of the century, hair was used shorter, but beards and moustaches were constantly used. </i>(<i><a href="http://thehistoryofthehairsworld.com/hair_19th_century.html" target="_blank">The History of the World of Hair, "The Nineteenth Century."</a></i> )<i>. </i></div>
</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRappnrhxeS4ZN7lRp-6m-fIpchaQ0PDDwACeTpZOxZWG31PTFXCmCegmD-NZ1SuHzrAplcktSS9jz7M2GnIt4sBeVdCXtn3Pmc-Z9nBIP4j4x0tHdyjQaClf9DmyH45fe8rrxImOz816C/s1600/Blog_divider_309_BLK.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />Jeff Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14680146273701688630noreply@blogger.com